Timeline of Events: How My Son Was Taken Without Due Process (Clean Legal Summary)

PAPER TRAIL

---

2025: Feb, Mar, Apr, May

2025

• February
  • 17
    • Jordan Peterson began moving to a new residence with his son.
    • While away finalizing the move, the mother, Anngeneth Degillo Peterson, took the child from her parents’ house, where the child was staying with the grandmother.
    • The child was removed without prior discussion, consent, or formal custody order.
  • 18
    • A public alert was posted on Facebook seeking help locating the child, stating the mother had previously been absent off and on (max span of 2 months), from the child’s life over a course of nearly 2 years.
    • The grandmother, Equella “Lina” Degillo, admitted to giving the child to her daughter without the father’s consent.
    • An attempt to file a blotter at Bacong Police Station for child abduction was rejected. The police cited the common practice that children under seven stay with the mother, despite the lack of a court order.
    • A blotter for theft (approx. 3,000 PHP) was filed against the grandmother. The money was returned later that evening.
  • 19–20
    • A public comment was posted by a Facebook user (Greg Nepho) across several groups, making multiple serious accusations against Jordan, including unverified claims of abuse, illegal residency, poor parenting, and references to a past conviction in the U.S.
    • The comment framed the mother’s removal of the child as lawful and necessary, citing alleged involvement of DSWD and local police.
  • 25
    • Second attempt made to file a blotter at Dumaguete Police. Referred back to Bacong due to jurisdiction.
• March
  • 31
    • Official email sent to the Bureau of Immigration requesting travel restrictions to prevent unauthorized removal of the child from the country.

• April
  • 1
    • Bureau of Immigration replied: confirmed that a court-issued Hold Departure Order (HDO) or DOJ-issued Watch List Order (WLO) is required to restrict travel.
  • 9
    • Formal transparency request sent to Bacong Police seeking any record of involvement in the child’s removal or related complaints.
  • 12
    • Bacong Police Refuse to File Kidnapping Blotter Despite a formal visit and written complaint, Bacong Chief of Police PMAJ Vann Joel C. Tingson refused to take action when I reported the illegal concealment of my son. Instead, he claimed:
      • Police cannot act—only DSWD can.
      • Mothers are always favored by law (false).
      • I should complain to the Ombudsman or Supreme Court if I’m not satisfied.
        He refused to record the blotter, dismissed clear violations of Family Code Article 211, and upheld a pattern of shielding DSWD and Sacsac Barangay from accountability. This meeting exposed a dangerous truth: local institutions are protecting each other, not children.
  • 17
    • Bacong Police (via PMAJ Tingson) formally responded stating:
      • No complaints or blotters filed regarding Jordan or the child.
      • No participation in the child’s removal.
• May
  • 2
    • Transparency request delivered in person to Sacsac Barangay, requesting records of any complaints, BPOs, or coordination with other agencies.
    • The request was reluctantly accepted without signed acknowledgment.